Overview
The final project is meant for you to propose a hypothetical study. You are not and should not be conducting human subjects research for this project. It is not necessary for the purposes of this assignment. All human subjects research requires written approval from the SNHU COCE Institutional Review Board in order to protect the welfare and ensure ethical treatment of the subjects.
Â
The final project for this course is the creation of a research report consisting of a literature review and research proposal.
One of the most exciting things you can do in psychology is research. Do you want to identify the reliability of a test of self-efficacy? Do you want to find the best way to lose weight or quit smoking? Do you want to solve the mystery of what portion of the screen a person’s eye is most likely to be drawn to while on the internet? Research can provide answers to these questions.
For many years, psychologists have been committed to research. This commitment has kept psychology moving forward, rather than falling prey to biases and “what is obvious†(but wrong). A set of tools is found in research that help us to avoid bias.
For the final project in this course, you will develop a research report consisting of a literature review and a research proposal. This will allow you to develop the skills associated with interpreting research to develop sound arguments. It will also allow you to plan and design research studies.
The project is divided into three milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Two, Three, and Five. The final project will be submitted in Module Seven.
Â
In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:
Â
Prompt
For the final project, you will develop a report containing a literature review and a research proposal using APA formatting and following the outline below. You will identify a topic for study, review at least six peer-reviewed psychological articles, write a literature review based on the articles, develop a hypothesis, and
Get Argumentative Analysis Paper Help Here!!
plan the research methodology, including your data collection and analysis techniques. Your APA paper should include the following formatting. Each of the three sections should include the appropriate sections from the outline below.
Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed:
Â
E.      Hypothesis
II.     Methods
B.     Data Collection
III.   Discussion
Milestone One: Topic Selection and Introduction
Milestones
In Module Two, you will submit the Milestone One Worksheet: Topic Selection and Introduction. You should build on the ideas from the Module One discussion to select your final topic. Remember to select an area of psychology that you wish to research. For example, you might look at cognitive psychology or developmental psychology. Then, within this field, you will pick a particular area that is of interest to you. For example, within the field of cognitive psychology, you might examine memory in emotional situations. Or, within developmental psychology, you might examine the development of executive functions in kindergarteners. Your final topic submission should discuss the area of psychology that you wish to research and provide a discussion of at least two articles that you might use in the literature review section of the introduction. You may use the article that you found to support your topic in the Module One discussion as one of your two articles, or choose two new articles. The articles should be used to support your topic choice and help you explain the different concepts that you will explore in your research. For example, if you are interested in looking at executive functions in kindergarteners, you might find two articles that describe prior research on this topic and discuss how the articles are relevant to your topic. What do the articles examine that you might also examine? Or what might be some limitations of the articles that you could address in your research? This milestone is graded with the Milestone One Rubric.
Â
Milestone Two: Hypothesis and Methodology
In Module Three, you will submit the Milestone Two Worksheet: Hypothesis and Methodology. For the hypothesis, you should give a brief overview of what you expect to find in your area of research based on the research you have gathered. Be sure that your hypothesis is clear and supported by literature, using specific examples from the literature. Next, you should discuss the specific method that you will use for your research proposal, for example, an experimental design, a correlational design, a survey, or a case study. You should also discuss the details of how this method will be used. For example, if you are using an experimental design, you will need to identify the independent and dependent variables of the experiment. Or, if you are using a survey, discuss how the survey will be carried out. How will you ensure the questions are well formulated? This milestone is graded with the Milestone Two Rubric.
Â
Milestone Three: Proposal Outline
In Module Five, you will submit an outline of your paper. The outline should contain descriptions of the critical elements (above) that you will include in the final paper and should be supported by at least six references. References should be listed to illustrate the literature you reviewed in Section I of the paper.
Additionally, you should use references to support your hypothesis and design selection. The outline should be 3–4 pages long and contain all critical elements of the final paper. You should use the template provided in the Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric document to prepare the outline. This template will also help you set up your paper for the final submission. This milestone is graded with the Milestone Three Rubric.
Â
Final Submission: Research Report
In Module Seven, you will submit your final paper. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded using the Final Project Rubric.
Â
Deliverables
Â
Milestone | Deliverable | Module Due | Grading |
One | Worksheet: Topic Selection and Literature
Review |
Two | Graded separately; Milestone One Rubric |
Two | Worksheet: Hypothesis and Methodology | Three | Graded separately; Milestone Two Rubric |
Three | Proposal Outline | Five | Graded separately; Milestone Three Rubric |
Final Submission: Research Report | Seven | Graded separately; Final Project Rubric |
Â
Final Project Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your research report should adhere to the latest guidelines for APA-formatting and be 6–8 pages in addition to any graphics used. Your report must be submitted as a Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least six sources cited in APA format. Consult the guidelines for following APA style found the 7th edition of the APA Manual.
Critical Elements | Exemplary (100%) | Proficient (85%) | Needs Improvement (55%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
Introduction: Identify Topic | Meets “Proficient†criteria and uses industry-specific language to establish expertise | Identifies and briefly summarizes the topic that will be studied | Identifies and briefly summarizes the topic that will be studied, but summary is cursory or irrelevant | Does not identify or summarize the topic that will be studied | 2.5 |
Introduction: Summarize Articles | Meets “Proficient†criteria and uses industry-specific language to establish expertise | Summarizes the articles relevant to the topic to research | Summarizes the articles relevant to the topic to research, but summary is cursory or irrelevant | Does not summarize articles relevant to the topic to research | 2.5 |
Introduction: Bias and Limitations | Meets “Proficient†criteria and is exceptionally insightful about the bias and limitations present | Discusses the bias and limitations present in the articles, with specific examples to support discussion | Discusses the bias and limitations present in the articles, but discussion is cursory or illogical or does not provide specific examples to support discussion | Does not discuss the bias and limitations present in the articles | 5 |
Introduction: Other Factors | Meets “Proficient†criteria and is exceptionally insightful about other factors that might impact credibility | Discusses the other factors present in the articles that might impact their credibility with specific examples to support discussion | Discusses the other factors present in the articles that might impact their credibility, but discussion is cursory or illogical or does not provide specific examples to support discussion | Does not discuss the other factors present in the articles that might impact their credibility | 5 |
Introduction: Influence | Meets “Proficient†criteria and is exceptionally insightful about how the bias and limitations may inform or influence research | Explains how the bias and limitations may inform or influence research | Explains how the bias and limitations may inform or influence research, but explanation is cursory or illogical | Does not explain how the bias and limitations may inform or influence research | 5 |
Introduction: Research Design and Methods | Meets “Proficient†criteria and uses industry-specific language to establish expertise | Summarizes the research design and methods described in these articles | Summarizes the research design and methods described in these articles, but summary is cursory | Does not summarize the research design and methods described in these articles | 5 |
Introduction: Appropriateness | Meets “Proficient†criteria and demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the applications of different research designs and methodologies | Discusses the appropriateness of the research design and methods in the articles | Discusses the appropriateness of the research design and methods in the articles, but discussion is cursory or illogical | Does not discuss the appropriateness of the research design and methods in the articles | 5 |
Introduction: Expectations | Meets “Proficient†criteria and demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the expectations of APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists | Discusses whether or not the research design and methods in the articles align to the expectations of the APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists, with specific examples to support discussion | Discusses whether or not the research design and methods in the articles align to the expectations of the APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists, but discussion is cursory or illogical or does not provide specific examples to support discussion | Does not discuss whether or not the research design and methods in the articles align to the expectations of the APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists | 5 |
Introduction: Research | Meets “Proficient†criteria and demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the applications of different research designs and methodologies | Discusses which research design and methods would be most appropriate for the research to be conducted | Discusses which research design and methods would be most appropriate for the research to be conducted, but discussion is cursory or illogical | Does not discuss which research design and methods would be most appropriate for the research to be conducted | 5 |
Introduction: Steps | Meets “Proficient†criteria and demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists | Explains the steps to be taken to ensure research aligns to the expectations of the APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists | Explains the steps to be taken to ensure research aligns to the expectations of the APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists, but explanation is cursory or illogical | Does not explain the steps to be taken to ensure research aligns to the expectations of the APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists | 5 |
Introduction: Hypothesis: State Your Hypothesis | Meets “Proficient†criteria, and hypothesis is exceptionally clear and concise | States a logical and appropriate hypothesis | States a hypothesis, but it is illogical or inappropriate | Does not state a hypothesis | 5 |
Introduction: Hypothesis: Hypothesis Context | Meets “Proficient†criteria and provides exceptionally insightful context to establish relevance of hypothesis | Explains where hypothesis fits in context of literature reviewed | Explains where hypothesis fits in context of literature reviewed, but explanation is cursory or illogical | Does not explain where hypothesis fits in context of literature reviewed | 5 |
Introduction: Hypothesis: Specific Examples | Meets “Proficient†criteria and discussion is exceptionally well supported and contextualized | Discusses specific examples from relevant literature that support the hypothesis | Discusses specific examples from relevant literature, but discussion is cursory or illogical or not all examples support the hypothesis | Does not discuss specific examples from relevant literature | 5 |
Methods: Methodology: Research Design and Methods | Meets “Proficient†criteria and demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the applications of different research designs and methodologies | Explains the research design and method selected and justifies why they are appropriate | Explains the research design and method selected and justifies why they are appropriate, but the design or method is not appropriate for the research or justification is illogical | Does not explain the research design and method selected and justify why they are appropriate | 3.75 |
Methods: Methodology: Research Participants | Meets “Proficient†criteria, and discussion is exceptionally comprehensive and contextualized | Discusses the research participants who will be involved in the study | Discusses the research participants who will be involved in the study, but discussion is cursory | Does not discuss the research participants who will be involved in the study | 3.75 |
Methods: Data Collection: Sampling Frame | Meets “Proficient†criteria, and description is exceptionally clear and contextualized | Describes an appropriate sampling frame | Describes the sampling frame, but it is not logical or appropriate | Does not describe the sampling frame | 3.75 |
Methods: Data Collection: Instrument | Meets “Proficient†criteria and demonstrates expertise in data collection processes | Discusses the data collection instrument and how the data collected will address the hypothesis | Discusses the data collection instrument and how the data collected will address the hypothesis, but discussion is cursory or the data collection instrument would not address the hypothesis | Does not discuss the data collection instrument or how the data collected will address the hypothesis | 3.75 |
Methods: Data Collection: Protection of Participants | Meets “Proficient†criteria and demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the APA | Explains how to ensure the protection of participants and adherence to the APA Ethical
Principles of Psychologists |
Explains how to ensure the protection of participants and adherence to the APA Ethical
Principles of Psychologists, but |
Does not explain how to ensure the protection of participants and adherence to the APA | 5 |
Ethical Principles of Psychologists | explanation is cursory or illogical | Ethical Principles of Psychologists | |||
Discussion: Supports | Meets “Proficient†criteria, and explanation is well supported with concrete examples | Explains how the evidence presented by the authors supports the research proposal | Explains how the evidence presented by the authors supports the research proposal, but explanation is cursory or illogical | Does not explain how the evidence presented by the authors supports the research proposal | 5 |
Discussion: Research Findings | Meets “Proficient†criteria, and explanation is exceptionally clear and contextualized | Explains how to appropriately convey research findings to audience | Explains how to convey research findings to audience, but explanation is cursory or not appropriate | Does not explain how to convey research findings to audience | 5 |
Discussion: Further Research | Meets “Proficient†criteria, and explanation is exceptionally insightful about other possibilities in further research | Explains what further research could be conducted that goes beyond or in a different direction | Explains what further research could be conducted that goes beyond or in a different direction, but explanation is cursory or illogical | Does not explain what further research could be conducted that goes beyond or in a different direction | 5 |
APA Formatting | Utilizes APA formatting with no major errors throughout the report | Utilizes APA formatting throughout the report with major errors | Does not utilize APA formatting throughout the report | 2.5 | |
Articulation of Response | Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to- read format | Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization | Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas | Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas | 2.5 |
Total | 100% |
Why Choose Us
Quality Papers
We value our clients. For this reason, we ensure that each paper is written carefully as per the instructions provided by the client. Our editing team also checks all the papers to ensure that they have been completed as per the expectations.
Professional Academic Writers
Over the years, our Acme Homework has managed to secure the most qualified, reliable and experienced team of writers. The company has also ensured continued training and development of the team members to ensure that it keep up with the rising Academic Trends.
Affordable Prices
Our prices are fairly priced in such a way that ensures affordability. Additionally, you can get a free price quotation by clicking on the "Place Order" button.
On-Time delivery
We pay strict attention on deadlines. For this reason, we ensure that all papers are submitted earlier, even before the deadline indicated by the customer. For this reason, the client can go through the work and review everything.
100% Originality
At Grade One Essays, all papers are plagiarism-free as they are written from scratch. We have taken strict measures to ensure that there is no similarity on all papers and that citations are included as per the standards set.
Customer Support 24/7
Our support team is readily available to provide any guidance/help on our platform at any time of the day/night. Feel free to contact us via the Chat window or support email: support@gradeoneessays.com.
Try it now!
How it works?
Follow these simple steps to get your paper done
Place your order
Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.
Proceed with the payment
Choose the payment system that suits you most.
Receive the final file
Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.
Our Services
Grade One Essays has stood as the world’s leading custom essay writing services providers. Once you enter all the details in the order form under the place order button, the rest is up to us.
Essays
At Grade One Essays, we prioritize on all aspects that bring about a good grade such as impeccable grammar, proper structure, zero-plagiarism and conformance to guidelines. Our experienced team of writers will help you completed your essays and other assignments.
Admissions
Admission and Business Papers
Be assured that you’ll definitely get accepted to the Master’s level program at any university once you enter all the details in the order form. We won’t leave you here; we will also help you secure a good position in your aspired workplace by creating an outstanding resume or portfolio once you place an order.
Editing
Editing and Proofreading
Our skilled editing and writing team will help you restructure you paper, paraphrase, correct grammar and replace plagiarized sections on your paper just on time. The service is geared toward eliminating any mistakes and rather enhancing better quality.
Coursework
Technical papers
We have writers in almost all fields including the most technical fields. You don’t have to worry about the complexity of your paper. Simply enter as much details as possible in the place order section.