XD3001 Assessment: Analyzing Personal Bias – Homework Solution
XD3001: Impact of Personal Bias on Communication and Mutual Respect
Assessment: Analyzing Personal Bias
Click each of the items below for more information on this Assessment.
In this Competency, advocating for diversity, equity, and inclusion in healthcare starts at the individual level of building understanding of key concepts and awareness of personal bias that impact interactions with those you care for, as well as fellow professionals. The Competency Assessment involves reflection and analysis of your own perceptions of self and others and for uncovering and addressing personal biases—all to further your efforts to be a champion of diversity, equity, and inclusion. There are no right or wrong answers in this Assessment. Rather, the aim is thorough and thoughtful responses.
To Prepare:
- Access the Analyzing Personal Bias template document. Review the required content to provide.
- Review the Module 1 and Module 2 Learning Resources for support in framing your analysis.
- Complete the Module 2 Exploratory activity: Learning Activity 3. You are required to choose at least three (3) tests of implicit bias. You are not required to share your test results as part of the Competency Assessment. However, your honest analysis of those results is encouraged. Review the relevant Learning Resources for guidance in understanding personal bias as you work to analyze your own.
To Complete the Competency Assessment
Using the Analyzing Personal Bias template document, respond to the following items in 3–4 pages. Note a reference page is included in the document. You may cite resources using the format that is familiar to you.
Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts
- Explain your understanding of the foundational concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
- Explain how you define the concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of cultural differences.
- Describe a situation when you responded to differences in others with a sense of advantage or disadvantage. Explain the factors that contributed to that perception.
Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias
- Summarize insights you gained from your Project Implicit Test results. Analyzing Personal Bias
- Analyze how your personal biases and values influence your thinking and behavior. Be specific with examples.
- Describe a situation when you communicated with others in a biased way or experienced communication that was biased. Apply your understanding of personal bias to explain this example.
- Explain your thoughts and feelings about the value of examining your personal biases—both as an individual and as a professional in the healthcare field.
- Describe at least two (2) strategies for combatting implicit bias that you would choose for yourself. Explain your reasoning. Note: Do not include introspection as a strategy, which you have applied and summarized through the Implicit Association Tests.
Complete and Submit.
Analyzing Personal Bias
Student Name Here
RN-BSN Tempo Program, Walden University
Course: Advocating for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare
XD3001: Impact of Personal Bias on Communication and Mutual Respect
Instructor Name
Month, Day, Year
(Enter the date submitted to the Instructor.)
Based on your work in this Competency, including review of the Learning Resources and completion of your choice of at least three (3) tests of implicit bias, respond to each part with thoughtful reflection and analysis. Support your responses with resource citations and references. Your Assessment should be 3–4 pages plus the title and reference pages.
Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts
- Explain your understanding of the foundational concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
- Explain how you define the concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of cultural differences.
- Describe a situation when you responded to differences in others with a sense of advantage or disadvantage. Explain the factors that contributed to that perception.
Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias
- Summarize insights you gained from your Project Implicit Test results.
- Analyze how your personal biases and values influence your thinking and behavior. Be specific with examples.
- Describe a situation when you communicated with others in a biased way or experienced communication that was biased. Apply your understanding of personal bias to explain this example.
- Explain your thoughts and feelings about the value of examining your personal biases, both as an individual and as a professional in the healthcare field. Analyzing Personal Bias
- Describe at least two (2) strategies for combatting implicit bias that you would choose for yourself. Explain your reasoning. Note: Do not include introspection as a strategy, which you have applied and summarized through the Implicit Association Tests.
References
Note: You may use the reference format you are familiar with, which may be APA or another.
XD3001: Impact of Personal Bias on Communication and Mutual Respect: Explain how awareness of one’s biases impacts relationships and communication with team members.
Assessment Rubric
| Rubric Criteria | Does Not Meet Expectations | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations |
| Module 1: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Healthcare | |||
| Part 1: Reflecting on Foundational Concepts | |||
| Using the Analyzing Personal Bias template document, address the following:
· Explain your understanding of the foundational concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion. Learning Objective 1.1: Explain concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion |
Response does not adequately explain individual understanding of the foundational concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion. | Response adequately explains individual understanding of the foundational concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion. | Response accurately and thoroughly explains individual understanding of the foundational concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion. |
| · Explain how you define the concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of cultural differences.
Learning Objective 1.2: Define concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of culture |
Response does not adequately explain definitions of the concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of cultural differences. | Response adequately explains definitions of the concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of cultural differences. Analyzing Personal Bias | Response accurately and thoroughly explains definitions of the concepts of advantage and disadvantage in the context of cultural differences. |
| · Describe a situation when you responded to differences in others with a sense of | Response does not adequately explain factors that contribute to perceptions of | Response adequately explains factors that contribute to perceptions of advantage or | Response accurately and thoroughly explains factors that contribute to perceptions of advantage |
| Rubric Criteria | Does Not Meet Expectations | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations |
| advantage or disadvantage. Explain the factors that contributed to that perception.
Learning Objective 1.3: Explain factors that influence perceptions of advantage or disadvantage in situations with others |
advantage or disadvantage in a situation that involved responding to differences in others. | disadvantage in a situation that involved responding to differences in others. Analyzing Personal Bias | or disadvantage in a situation that involved responding to differences in others. |
| Module 2: Impact of Personal Bias in Healthcare | |||
| Part 2: Analyzing Personal Bias | |||
| Using the Analyzing Personal Bias template document, address the following:
· Summarize insights you gained from your Project Implicit Test results. Learning Objective 2.1: Summarize insights from results of personal bias tests |
Response does not adequately summarize insights from Project Implicit Test results. | Response adequately summarizes insights from Project Implicit Test results. | Response accurately and thoroughly summarizes insights from Project Implicit Test results. |
| · Analyze how your personal biases and values influence your thinking and behavior. Be specific with examples.
Learning Objective 2.2: Analyze the influence of individual biases and values on thinking and behavior |
Response does not adequately analyze with examples how personal biases and values influence thinking and behavior. | Response adequately analyzes with specific examples how personal biases and values influence thinking and behavior. | Response accurately and thoroughly analyzes with specific examples how personal biases and values influence thinking and behavior. Analyzing Personal Bias |
| Rubric Criteria | Does Not Meet Expectations | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations |
| · Describe a situation when you communicated with others in a biased way or experienced communication that was biased. Apply your understanding of personal bias to explain this example.
Learning Objective 2.3: Apply understanding of personal bias to examples of biased communication |
Response does not adequately describe a situation when communication was biased and/or adequately apply understanding of personal bias to explain the example. Analyzing Personal Bias | Response adequately describes a situation when communication was biased and adequately applies understanding of personal bias to explain the example. | Response accurately and thoroughly describes a situation when communication was biased and accurately and thoroughly applies understanding of personal bias to explain the example. |
| · Explain your thoughts and feelings about the value of examining your personal biases—both as an individual and as a professional in the healthcare field.
Learning Objective 2.4: Analyze the value of examining personal biases as an individual and healthcare professional |
Response does not adequately explain thoughts and feelings about the value of examining personal biases—both as an individual and as a professional in the healthcare field. | Response adequately explains thoughts and feelings about the value of examining personal biases—both as an individual and as a professional in the healthcare field. | Response accurately and thoroughly explains thoughts and feelings about the value of examining personal biases—both as an individual and as a professional in the healthcare field. Analyzing Personal Bias |
| Rubric Criteria | Does Not Meet Expectations | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations |
| · Describe at least two (2) strategies for combatting implicit bias that you would choose for yourself. Explain your reasoning. Note: Do not include introspection as a strategy, which you have applied and summarized through the Implicit Association Tests.
Learning Objective 2.5: Describe strategies to combat implicit bias |
Response does not adequately explain the individual choice of at least two (2) strategies to apply for combatting implicit bias and/or includes introspection as a strategy, which was applied and summarized through the Implicit Association Tests. Analyzing Personal Bias | Response adequately explains the individual choice of at least two (2) strategies to apply for combatting implicit bias and does not include introspection as a strategy, which was applied and summarized through the Implicit Association Tests. | Response accurately and thoroughly explains the individual choice of at least two (2) strategies to apply for combatting implicit bias and does not include introspection as a strategy, which was applied and summarized through the Implicit Association Tests. |
Read more on; buying an essay.
Professional Skills Assessment
| Professional Writing | |||
| Professional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization | Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors.
Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization. |
Content contains few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is satisfactorily clear, logical, and/or organized, but could
benefit from additional editing/revision. |
Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors.
Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is clear, logical, and well-organized. |
| Professional Writing: | Content minimally or does | Content demonstrates | Content clearly |
| Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone | not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias.
Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing. |
satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context. | demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context. Analyzing Personal Bias |
| Professional Writing: Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas | Content does not adequately reflect original writing and/or paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates inconsistent adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and reference. There are
numerous and/or significant errors. |
Content adequately reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates adequate adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references.
There are one or two minor errors. Analyzing Personal Bias |
Content reflects original thought and writing and proper paraphrasing.
Writing demonstrates full adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. |
