BUS 210 Module Five Assignment Solution | Imagine that you have been hired as a consultant to investigate the social responsibility of two companies, TOMS Shoes and The Body Shop.
BUS 210 Module Five Assignment Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
Imagine that you have been hired as a consultant to investigate the social responsibility of two companies, TOMS Shoes and The Body Shop. Your manager finds both of these companies to be inspirational. She would like the SNHU Pet Supply Company to become more socially conscious and has asked you to investigate what Toms and The Body Shop are doing. You are responsible for researching how their socially responsible practices impact both the companies and their customers. Your manager would like you to make some suggestions about how the SNHU Pet Supply Company can become more socially responsible and make ethical decisions.
Prompt
You will create an opinion brief about the two companies and suggest a social change for your company. Be sure to use evidence from the course (such as the definition of social responsibility found in your readings) to support your response and suggestions.
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
Socially Responsible Efforts: Describe each company’s efforts to promote ethical and social good. Benefits: Describe the organizational benefits from adopting socially conscious policies. Get MLC Prerequisite Reflective Essay Help
Socially Responsible Policy: Suggest one socially responsible policy that the SNHU Pet Supply Company could put into place, and explain how this would benefit the company and its consumers.
What to Submit
Submit your brief as a 1-to-2-page Word document using 12-point Times New Roman, one-inch margins, and double spacing. Sources should be cited according to APA style.
Module Five Assignment Rubric
|
Criteria |
Exemplary (100%) |
Proficient (85%) |
Needs
Improvement (55%) |
Not Evident (0%) |
Value |
| Socially | Exceeds proficiency | Describes each | Shows progress | Does not attempt | 30 |
| Responsible | in an exceptionally | company’s socially | toward proficiency, | criterion | |
| Efforts | clear, insightful, | responsible policies | but with errors or | ||
| sophisticated, or | and practices | omissions; areas for | |||
| creative manner | improvement may | ||||
| include adding more | |||||
| detail to the | |||||
| response or | |||||
| ensuring that the | |||||
| information is | |||||
| accurate | |||||
| Benefits | Exceeds proficiency | Describes the | Shows progress | Does not attempt | 30 |
| in an exceptionally | organizational | toward proficiency, | criterion | ||
| clear, insightful, | benefits from | but with errors or | |||
| sophisticated, or | adopting socially | omissions; areas for | |||
| creative manner | conscious policies | improvement may | |||
| include adding detail | |||||
| to the response or | |||||
| ensuring that the | |||||
| response is accurate | |||||
| Socially | Exceeds proficiency | Suggests one ethical | Shows progress | Does not attempt | 30 |
| Responsible | in an exceptionally | policy that the | toward proficiency, | criterion | |
| Policy | clear, insightful, | SNHU Pet Supply | but with errors or | ||
| sophisticated, or | Company could put | omissions; areas for | |||
| creative manner | into place, and | improvement may | |||
| explains how this | include adding detail | ||||
| would benefit the | to the response or | ||||
| company and its | ensuring that the | ||||
| consumers | explanation is logical | ||||
| and accurate | |||||
| Articulation of | Exceeds proficiency | Clearly conveys | Shows progress | Submission has | 5 |
| Response | in an exceptionally | meaning with | toward proficiency, | critical errors in | |
| clear, insightful, | correct grammar, | but with errors in | grammar, sentence | ||
| sophisticated, or | sentence structure, | grammar, sentence | structure, and | ||
| creative manner | and spelling, | structure, and | spelling, preventing | ||
| demonstrating an | spelling, negatively | understanding of | |||
| understanding of | impacting | ideas | |||
| audience and | readability | ||||
| purpose | |||||
| Citations and | Uses citations for | Uses citations for | Uses citations for | Does not use | 5 |
| Attributions | ideas requiring | ideas requiring | ideas requiring | citations for ideas | |
| attribution, with few | attribution, with | attribution, with | requiring attribution | ||
| or no minor errors | consistent minor | major errors | |||
| errors | |||||
| Total: | 100% | ||||
