NUR521 Choose a patient-care situation in which the RN should intervene and advocate for the patient. An example of such a situation might be when a patient has not been given complete informed consent | Homework Solution

Choose a patient-care situation in which the RN should intervene and advocate for the patient. An example of such a situation might be when a patient has not been given complete informed consent.

Include the following in your paper:

• Describe the clinical situation concisely and descriptively. It can be an actual situation or a hypothetical one.
• Apply the bioethical decision-making model to the specific clinical ethical situation that you choose. Address each section of the model in your paper. Choose a patient-care situation
• Conclude with a discussion of nursing advocacy in the clinical setting and the nurse’s role as a patient advocate.

Your paper should be 4-5 pages.

You must reference and cite 1-2 scholarly sources other than your text. Include a title page and a reference page to cite your text and adhere to APA formatting.

an example is taken from

COMPETENT PATIENT

A competent adult patient’s wishes concerning his or her person may not be disregarded. The court in In re Melideo held that every human being of adult years has a right to determine what shall be done with his or her own body and cannot be subjected to medical treatment without his or her consent. Choose a patient-care situation When there is no compelling state interest that justifies overriding an adult patient’s decision, that decision should be respected. State interests include preserving life, preventing suicide, safeguarding the integrity of the medical profession, and protecting innocent third parties

SPOUSE

The patient in Greynolds v. Kurman suffered a transient ischemic attack, a sudden loss of neurological function caused by vascular impairment to the brain. He was taken to an emergency department. Because of the patient’s prior medical history, which included transient ischemic attacks, he was at high risk for a stroke. After receiving the results of noninvasive tests, Dr. Rafecas, a consulting physician, ordered a cerebral angiogram. Dr. Kurman performed the angiogram, and the patient suffered a stroke during the procedure that left him severely disabled.

The patient and his wife filed a medical malpractice action against Rafecas and Kurman, asserting that Rafecas had negligently recommended the procedure and that Kurman had performed the procedure without obtaining informed consent. Choose a patient-care situation The court of appeals held that the evidence was sufficient to support a judgment in favor of the patient and his wife.

The jury needed to determine that the risks involved in the cerebral angiogram were not disclosed, that the risks involved in the procedure materialized and caused the stroke, and that a reasonable person in the position of the patient would have decided against having the angiogram had the risks associated with the procedure been disclosed.

The jury concluded that the patient did not consent to the angiogram because he “was not capable of comprehending the consent form” and further noted that Kurman should have sought consent from the next of kin, specifically the spouse. Given the evidence of the patient’s condition when he signed the consent forms, his past medical history, and his increased risk of suffering complications during an angiogram, the court found that evidence supported a finding of lack of informed consent. Choose a patient-care situation

Get Journal Critique Assignment Help!!

This is from Pozgar, G.D Legal and Ethical Issues for Health Professional.

Bioethical decision making model is based on these Bullet point

Introduction

Dilemma

Medical facts

Non-medical facts

Review the Underlaying Ethical Principles

Define Alternatives Choose a patient-care situation

Define the process to be used with the chosen alternative.

Conclusion