(Solved) NR 662: Advanced Nursing Role synthesis: Module 6: MSN Project Poster Presentation Solution Solution
NR 662: Advanced Nursing Role synthesis: Module 6: MSN Project Poster Presentation Guidelines and Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is for students to display the major components of their MSN Project as part of the Dissemination phase. Part of the dissemination process is to share the findings with the stakeholders of the organization. This poster will allow the student to present this information in an organized fashion. This poster could then be suitable at research conferences for use in the future. Use the poster template provided on the assignment page to complete this assignment.
Course Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will address the following course learning outcomes:
- CO 5: Disseminates scholarly work (POs 4,5) MSN Project Poster Presentation
- CO 6: Embodies the concept of extraordinary nurse through professional growth, career, and succession planning (POs 3,4) MSN Project Poster Presentation
Suggested Due Date
This assignment has a suggested due date of Sunday 11:59 pm MT at the end of Module 6.
Final due date is Sunday 11:59 pm MT at the end of Module 7.
Total Points Possible: 125 Points
Assignment Overview
In this assignment, students will use the NR662 Poster template to display the purpose, method, and findings of their Capstone Projects. Use the poster template provided on the assignment page to complete this assignment.
Assignment Instructions MSN Project Poster Presentation
- Poster has a professional appearance. Generally, the only images used should be tables or graphs related to results.
- Poster must include all of the following elements
- Title and author information
- Practice Issue and PICOT question
- Brief review of literature
- Intervention Description
- Evaluation/results
- Conclusions MSN Project Poster Presentation
- Spacing between elements of the poster should be evenly distributed. Note than when the boxes are filled, they will expand, which decreases the spaces between boxes. You may have to adjust the size of some boxes to fit the content.
- Reference font can be much smaller than the rest of the poster. You will only have space for a few references so chose the most important ones.
- Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.
- Sources older than five years may not be used without the permission of the class professor.
- Citation of sources, and references must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual.
- Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure are followed and consistent with formal, scholarly writing as noted in the APA Manual (current edition). MSN Project Poster Presentation
- Please note: If you do not receive a proficient rating in any major content category, you can re-submit your assignment with revisions in those content categories to receive a better grade. You have one additional opportunity to revise after the initial submission in order to make improvements. The initial submission must be a complete paper, rough drafts will not be graded. All revisions must be submitted no later than Sunday of Module 7 at 11:59pm. (You cannot revise your APA for a higher grade in that category)
Read more on; DATCB565 Competency 3 Assessment
Assignment Criteria MSN Project Poster Presentation
| Assessment Criteria | Points | % | Description |
| Author, Title and Organization | 10 | 10% | · Author, Title and Organization information is provided at the top of the poster. MSN Project Poster Presentation
|
| Identification of Practice Issue and PICOT question | 10 | 10% | · Practice issue is clearly described.
· PICOT question and elements are present
|
| Brief Review of Literature | 25 | 25% | · A logical and brief review of the literature is provided.
· Summarize key ideas, facts, and/or themes from literature that support a change in practice. |
| Description of Intervention | 20 | 20% | The intervention is clearly described and includes:
· Description of the setting for where the project is being implemented MSN Project Poster Presentation · Identification and list critical milestones and tasks
|
| Evaluation/Results and Conclusion | 25 | 25% | · The evaluation and results are clearly described.
· Conclusion is present and should represent the contribution your MSN project has made to nursing practice. |
| Graduate-level Writing Style | 10 | 10%
|
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure. MSN Project Poster Presentation
· Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing · Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person · Correct APA format for the following o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) MSN Project Poster Presentation |
| Total | 100 | 100% | A quality assignment will meet or exceed the above requirements. |
GRADING RUBRIC MSN Project Poster Presentation
| Assessment Criteria | Distinguished
(100%)
|
Exceeds
(92%)
|
Proficient
(84%)
|
Needs Improvement
(0)
|
| Author, Title and Organization | 10 Points | 0 Points | ||
| Author, Title and Organization information is provided at the top of the poster. MSN Project Poster Presentation
|
|
Author, Title and Organization are missing.
|
||
| Identification of Practice Issue or problem | 10 Points | 9 Points | 8 Points | 0 Points |
| Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner:
· Practice issue/problem is clearly described. · PICOT Question and elements are present
|
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
· Practice issue/problem is clearly described. · PICOT Question and elements are present
|
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
· Practice issue/problem is clearly described. · PICOT Question and elements are present
|
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:
· Practice issue/problem is clearly described. · PICOT Question and elements are present
|
|
| Logical and Brief Literature Review | 25 Points | 23 Points | 22 Points | 0 Points |
| Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner:
· A logical and brief review of the literature is provided. MSN Project Poster Presentation
· Summarize key ideas, facts, and/or themes from literature that support a change in practice. |
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
· A logical and brief review of the literature is provided.
· Summarize key ideas, facts, and/or themes from literature that support a change in practice.
|
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
· A logical and brief review of the literature is provided. MSN Project Poster Presentation
· Summarize key ideas, facts, and/or themes from literature that support a change in practice.
|
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:
· A logical and brief review of the literature is provided. MSN Project Poster Presentation
· Summarize key ideas, facts, and/or themes from literature that support a change in practice. |
|
| Description of the Intervention | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points |
| Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner:
The intervention is clearly described and includes: · Description of the setting for where the project is being implemented · Identification and list critical milestones and tasks. MSN Project Poster Presentation
|
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
The intervention is clearly described and includes: · Description of the setting for where the project is being implemented · Identification and list critical milestones and tasks. MSN Project Poster Presentation
|
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
The intervention is clearly described and includes: · Description of the setting for where the project is being implemented · Identification and list critical milestones and tasks
|
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:
The intervention is clearly described and includes: · Description of the setting for where the project is being implemented · Identification and list critical milestones and tasks
|
|
| Evaluation/Results and Conclusions | 25 Points | 23 Points | 22 Points | 0 Points |
| Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner:
· The evaluation/results and fully and clearly described.
· The conclusion is present and should represent the contribution your MSN project has made to nursing practice.
|
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
· The evaluation/results are fully and clearly described.
· The conclusion is present and should represent the contribution your MSN project has made to nursing practice.
|
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
· The evaluation/results fully and clearly described.
· The conclusion is present and should represent the contribution your MSN project has made to nursing practice.
|
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:
· The evaluation/results are fully and clearly described.
· The conclusion is present and should represent the contribution your MSN project has made to nursing practice.
|
|
| Graduate-level Writing Style | 10 Points | 9 Points | 8 Points | 0 Points |
| Distinguished graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting all of the following criteria with 0-1 errors total:
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence structure. · Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing · Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person · Layout of poster and spacing is nicely displayed · Correct APA format for the following: o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
|
Graduate-level writing style exceeds expectations as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 2-4 errors total: MSN Project Poster Presentation
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence structure. · Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing · Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person · Layout of poster and spacing is nicely displayed · Correct APA format for the following: o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
|
Proficient graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 5-7 errors, total:
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence structure. · Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing · Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person · Layout of poster and spacing is nicely displayed · Correct APA format for the following: o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
|
Graduate-level writing style needs improvement as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 8 or more errors, total:
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation and sentence structure. · Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing · Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person · Layout of poster and spacing is nicely displayed · Correct APA format for the following: o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
|
