(Solved) PSY 570 2-1 Discussion: Multiple Role Relationships | Homework Solution
2-1 Discussion: Multiple Role Relationships
Define a multiple role relationship and how one might occur in professional psychology. Provide a brief example or scenario of a multiple role relationship. Discuss why your example scenario could be potentially problematic. How can multiple role relationships be either avoided or handled professionally? How might this relationship be permissible?
Check out the following articles to learn more about the APA’s ethics code in terms of multiple role relationships:
American Psychological Association: Multiple relationships and APA’s new Ethics Code: Values and applications
This article provides insight about boundaries and recommendations to remain ethical: Multiple Role Relationships
Boundaries and Multiple Relationships in Psychotherapy: Recommendations for Ethical Practice
Feel free to share your thoughts after reading these sources. Did you learn something new?
https://www.apa.org/monitor/jan04/ethics
https://societyforpsychotherapy.org/boundaries-and-multiple-relationships-in-psychotherapy-rec ommendations-for-ethical-practice/
Recommended best practices:
Initial post (1):
- Composed of two to three paragraphs unless otherwise noted
- In Module One, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.
- In Modules Two through Ten, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
- Considers material (course content, other discussions, etc.) from the current module and previous modules
Response posts (2):
- Reply to at least two other classmates outside of your own initial post thread
- In Module One, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.
- In Modules Two through Ten, complete the two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
- Must have more depth and critical thinking than simply “I agree†or “you are wrongâ€
- Get Charlies suspension Essay Help!!
Discussion Rubric
| Criteria | Exemplary | Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Evident | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application | The discussion post was written in a manner indicating that the student clearly understood the ethical concepts presented in class; demonstrates appropriate application of concepts (100%) | The discussion post was written in a manner indicating that the student understood the ethical concepts presented in class; demonstrates application of concepts (90%) | The discussion post was written in a manner indicating that the student struggled with the ethical concepts presented in class (70%) | Student did not provide an initial response to the discussion question (0%) | 35 |
| Timeliness | N/A Multiple Role Relationships | Submits initial post on time (100%) | Submits initial post one day late (70%) | Submits initial post two or more days late (0%) | 10 |
| Critical Thinking | Student demonstrates critical thinking with the initial and response posts. Critical elements are addressed in a comprehensive manner, tying the response back to the literature presented in the week (100%) | Student provides a well-thought-out initial post that demonstrates a working knowledge of the literature presented from the week; response posts demonstrate critical analysis (90%) | Student provides a well-thought-out initial post, but does not make connections to the material presented in the course work from the week; response posts indicate challenges with critical thinking (70%) | Student did not provide an initial response to the discussion question (0%) Multiple Role Relationships | 25 |
| Writing (Mechanics/ Citations) | No errors related to organization, grammar and style, or citations (100%) | Minor errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (90%) | Some errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (70%) | Major errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (0%) | 20 |
| Participation | Student provides the required quantity of participation posts which are substantive, respectful, and add something new to the discussion (100%) | Student provides the required quantity of participation posts. A majority of the posts are substantive and respectful to fellow learners (90%) | Student does not submit the required quantity or quality of participation posts (70%) Multiple Role Relationships | Student does not submit any participation posts to fellow learners for the discussion question (0%) | 10 |
| Total: | 100% | ||||
