NR 562: Leadership and Management Within Complex Healthcare Systems: Module 6 Assignment: Data-driven Decision-making in Complex Systems – Homework Solution
NR 562: Leadership and Management Within Complex Healthcare Systems: Module 6 Assignment: Data-driven Decision-making in Complex Systems Guideline and Rubric
Purpose
Across healthcare settings, a vast amount of information is collected and analyzed to assess organizational outcomes regarding quality, safety, and efficiency. The analysis of this data is used to measure organizational performance and to drive strategic decision-making within the system. The purpose of this assignment is to examine one specific data point and how it contributes to the assessment of quality, safety, and/or efficiency within the healthcare system. The importance of the selected data point, how it shapes decision-making, and implications for healthcare systems will be discussed.
Course Learning Outcomes NR 562
Through this assignment, the student will address the following course learning outcomes:
- CO 3: Determine strategies to support efficiency and the responsible use of healthcare resources. (PO 2)
- CO 4: Develop problem-solution strategies for a selected issues within the healthcare environment. (PO 5)
Suggested Due Date
This assignment has a suggested due date of Sunday 11:59 pm MT at the end of Module 6.
Final due date is Sunday 11:59 pm MT at the end of Module 7.
Total Points Possible: 200 Points
Assignment Overview NR 562
Consider how data analysis contributes to safe, high quality, efficient delivery of healthcare. Investigate the role of information management in the evaluation of outcome achievement and provision of data to drive strategic decision-making. Identify one specific data point for which information is collected within a healthcare system. Develop a 4 – 6 page paper to address the rubric expectations; use a minimum of 5 scholarly sources to support your work.
- Provide an introduction to the paper.
- Explain one selected data point and the purpose for the collection of this data within the healthcare system. Describe how this data point measures quality, safety, and/or efficiency within the system. Discuss one internal or external benchmark surrounding this data point that serves as a measure or indicator of success.
- Describe a case scenario where outcomes regarding this data point fall short of meeting the required benchmark. Identify the stakeholders impacted by the poor outcome, and the consequences realized by each stakeholder. Discuss the potential impact on organizational quality, safety, and/or efficiency that results. NR 562
- Describe how outcomes surrounding this data point reflect organizational performance regarding quality, safety, or efficiency. Explain how the data in the case scenario can inform strategic decision-making to improve organizational outcomes. Create an action plan to correct the poor outcomes noted in the case scenario. Explain the action steps, stakeholder involvement, influencing factors that will impact the plan.
- Provide a conclusion to the paper.
Read more on; online coursework help.
Assignment Instructions NR 562
- Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.
- Sources older than five years may not be used without the permission of the class professor.
- Title page, pagination, subheadings, body of paper, citation of sources, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual. NR 562
- Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure are followed and consistent with formal, scholarly writing as noted in the APA Manual (current edition).
- Sources older than five years may not be used without the permission of the class professor.
- No direct quotes are to be used in this assignment. NR 562
- Please note: If you do not receive a proficient rating in any major content category, you can re-submit your assignment with revisions in those content categories to receive a better grade. You have one additional opportunity to revise after the initial submission in order to make improvements. The initial submission must be a complete paper, rough drafts will not be graded. All revisions must be submitted no later than Sunday of Week 7 at 11:59pm. (You cannot revise your graduate level writing style for a higher grade in that category)
Assignment Criteria NR 562
| Assessment Criteria | Points | % | Description |
| Introduction
|
20 | 10% | This section includes:
· Importance of information management to determine outcomes healthcare systems · Role of data to inform decision-making to promote quality, safety, and efficiency NR 562 · Identification of the sections of the paper · Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented |
| Data Collection to Measure Outcomes | 40 | 20% | This section includes:
· Description of one identified data point and purpose for collection within the healthcare system · Explanation of how outcomes surrounding this data point contribute to assessment of organizational performance regarding quality, safety, and/or efficiency · Description of one example of an internal or external benchmark regarding this data point to serve as an indicator of success. Data-driven Decision-making in Complex Systems · Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented |
| Case Application | 40 | 20% | This section includes
· Description of a case scenario where outcomes regarding this data point fall short of meeting the identified benchmark · Discussion of the potential impact on organizational quality, safety, and/or efficiency that results NR 562 · Identification of stakeholders impacted by the poor outcome and the consequences realized by each stakeholder |
| Data-driven Decision-making | 50 | 25% | This section includes:
· Explanation of how data in the case scenario can be used to inform strategic decision-making to improve outcomes regarding quality, safety, or efficiency · Create an action plan to correct the poor outcomes noted in the case scenario · Explain the action steps, stakeholder involvement, and influencing factors that will impact the plan · Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented |
| Conclusion | 20 | 10% | This section includes:
· Concluding points regarding the role of information management and outcome assessment to inform decision-making within healthcare systems · Importance of outcome assessment to sustain or improve quality, safety, and/or efficiency within healthcare systems |
| Graduate-level Writing Style | 30 | 15%
|
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure
· Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing · Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person. Data-driven Decision-making in Complex Systems · Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes used in this assignment · Correct APA format for the following: o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) |
| Quality of Literature Support | It is an expectation that a minimum of 5 scholarly sources, current within five years, are integrated within the assignment.
If the above expectation is not met, 5 points shall be deducted. Data-driven Decision-making in Complex Systems
|
||
| Assignment Length Criteria | It is an expectation that the paper is a minimum of 4 pages in length, and a maximum of 6 pages (not including the title or reference pages).
Read more on; ER avoidable use. If the above expectation is not met, 5 points shall be deducted.
|
||
| Total | 200 | 100% | A quality assignment will meet or exceed the above requirements. |
Grading Rubric
| Assessment Criteria | Distinguished
(100%)
|
Exceeds
(92%)
|
Proficient
(84%)
|
Needs Improvement
(0)
|
| Introduction | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points |
| Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner:
· Importance of information management to determine outcomes healthcare systems · Role of data to inform decision-making to promote quality, safety, and efficiency · Identification of the sections of the paper · Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
|
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
· Importance of information management to determine outcomes healthcare systems · Role of data to inform decision-making to promote quality, safety, and efficiency · Identification of the sections of the paper · Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented |
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
· Importance of information management to determine outcomes healthcare systems · Role of data to inform decision-making to promote quality, safety, and efficiency · Identification of the sections of the paper · Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented |
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:
· Importance of information management to determine outcomes healthcare systems · Role of data to inform decision-making to promote quality, safety, and efficiency · Identification of the sections of the paper · Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented
|
|
| Data Collection to Measure Outcomes | 40 Points | 36 Points | 33 Points | 0 Points |
| Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner:
· Description of one identified data point and purpose for collection within the healthcare system · Explanation of how outcomes surrounding this data point contribute to assessment of organizational performance regarding quality, safety, and/or efficiency · Description of one example of an internal or external benchmark regarding this data point to serve as an indicator of success · Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented |
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
· Description of one identified data point and purpose for collection within the healthcare system · Explanation of how outcomes surrounding this data point contribute to assessment of organizational performance regarding quality, safety, and/or efficiency · Description of one example of an internal or external benchmark regarding this data point to serve as an indicator of success · Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented |
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
· Description of one identified data point and purpose for collection within the healthcare system · Explanation of how outcomes surrounding this data point contribute to assessment of organizational performance regarding quality, safety, and/or efficiency · Description of one example of an internal or external benchmark regarding this data point to serve as an indicator of success · Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented |
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:
· Description of one identified data point and purpose for collection within the healthcare system · Explanation of how outcomes surrounding this data point contribute to assessment of organizational performance regarding quality, safety, and/or efficiency · Description of one example of an internal or external benchmark regarding this data point to serve as an indicator of success · Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented |
|
| Case Application | 40 Points | 36 Points | 33 Points | 0 Points |
| Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner:
· Description of a case scenario where outcomes regarding this data point fall short of meeting the identified benchmark · Discussion of the potential impact on organizational quality, safety, and/or efficiency that results · Identification of stakeholders impacted by the poor outcome and the consequences realized by each stakeholder
|
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
· Description of a case scenario where outcomes regarding this data point fall short of meeting the identified benchmark · Discussion of the potential impact on organizational quality, safety, and/or efficiency that results · Identification of stakeholders impacted by the poor outcome and the consequences realized by each stakeholder |
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
· Description of a case scenario where outcomes regarding this data point fall short of meeting the identified benchmark · Discussion of the potential impact on organizational quality, safety, and/or efficiency that results · Identification of stakeholders impacted by the poor outcome and the consequences realized by each stakeholder
|
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:
· Description of a case scenario where outcomes regarding this data point fall short of meeting the identified benchmark · Discussion of the potential impact on organizational quality, safety, and/or efficiency that results · Identification of stakeholders impacted by the poor outcome and the consequences realized by each stakeholder
|
|
| Data-driven Decision-making | 50 Points | 46 Points | 42 Points | 0 Points |
| Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner: NR 562
· Explanation of how data in the case scenario can be used to inform strategic decision-making to improve outcomes regarding quality, safety, or efficiency · Create an action plan to correct the poor outcomes noted in the case scenario · Explain the action steps, stakeholder involvement, and influencing factors that will impact the plan · Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented |
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
· Explanation of how data in the case scenario can be used to inform strategic decision-making to improve outcomes regarding quality, safety, or efficiency · Create an action plan to correct the poor outcomes noted in the case scenario · Explain the action steps, stakeholder involvement, and influencing factors that will impact the plan · Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented |
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
· Explanation of how data in the case scenario can be used to inform strategic decision-making to improve outcomes regarding quality, safety, or efficiency NR 562 · Create an action plan to correct the poor outcomes noted in the case scenario NR 562 · Explain the action steps, stakeholder involvement, and influencing factors that will impact the plan · Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented NR 562 |
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas:
· Explanation of how data in the case scenario can be used to inform strategic decision-making to improve outcomes regarding quality, safety, or efficiency · Create an action plan to correct the poor outcomes noted in the case scenario · Explain the action steps, stakeholder involvement, and influencing factors that will impact the plan · Sufficient integration of scholarly sources to support information presented |
|
| Conclusion | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 Points |
| Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner: NR 562
· Concluding points regarding the role of information management and outcome assessment to inform decision-making within healthcare systems · Importance of outcome assessment to sustain or improve quality, safety, and/or efficiency within healthcare systems
|
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial:
· Concluding points regarding the role of information management and outcome assessment to inform decision-making within healthcare systems · Importance of outcome assessment to sustain or improve quality, safety, and/or efficiency within healthcare systems
|
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas:
· Concluding points regarding the role of information management and outcome assessment to inform decision-making within healthcare systems · Importance of outcome assessment to sustain or improve quality, safety, and/or efficiency within healthcare systems |
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas: NR 562
· Concluding points regarding the role of information management and outcome assessment to inform decision-making within healthcare systems · Importance of outcome assessment to sustain or improve quality, safety, and/or efficiency within healthcare systems
|
|
| Graduate-level Writing Style | 30 Points | 27 Points | 25 Points | 0 Points |
| Distinguished graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting all of the following criteria with 0-1 errors total: NR 562
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure · Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing · Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person · Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes used in this assignment · Correct MLA format for the following: o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers)
|
Graduate-level writing style exceeds expectations as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 2-4 errors total: NR 562
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure · Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing · Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person · Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes used in this assignment · Correct APA format for the following: NR 562 o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources NR 562 o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) |
Proficient graduate-level writing style is evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 5-7 errors, total:
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure · Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing · Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person · Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes used in this assignment · Correct APA format for the following: o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) |
Graduate-level writing style needs improvement as evidenced by meeting the following criteria with 8 or more errors, total:
· Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure · Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing · Scholarly, professional writing tone with no use of first person · Synthesis of information is present with no direct quotes used in this assignment · Correct APA format for the following: NR 562 o Page numbering o Font style and size o Margins and spacing o Headings; subheadings o Citation and referencing sources o Mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) |
|
| Quality of Literature Support | 0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Deducted | ||
| A minimum of 5 peer-reviewed scholarly sources, current within 5 years, are integrated within the assignment. | The assignment fails to meet the requirement noted for quality of literature support. | |||
| Assignment Length Expectations | 0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Deducted | ||
| The length of the assignment meets the criteria: NR 562
Minimum of 4 pages in length;
Maximum of 6 pages in length.
(Not including title or reference pages) |
The assignment fails to meet the requirement for length. NR 562 | |||
