(Answered) NUR695 Scholarly Paper Assignment Solution
NUR695 Scholarly Paper Assignment
NUR695 Scholarly Paper Guidelines
The major assignment deliverable for your capstone course is a scholarly paper to be written on a topic related to nursing education. You are to identify an issue, need, gap, or opportunity associated with:
- any issue in nursing education at any level (e.g. pre-licensure; post-licensure, graduate);
- nursing education as it relates to a selected patient population; or
- nursing education as it relates to healthcare
You are to develop a research question on your chosen topic and propose an evidence-based intervention for the identified problem. A thorough investigation of research studies from the literature, evidence-based practice guidelines, and/or models for best practices will support your proposed intervention. You will describe and evaluate potential outcomes for the intervention and the metrics that can potentially be used to measure the outcomes of the proposed intervention. You may choose to complete the intervention and write about actual results if time permits. Should you elect to do this, you must gain prior approval from your professor.
As part of this assignment, you will need to choose a healthcare journal for manuscript submission and will follow the author guidelines for the chosen journal. The paper will be developed and submitted to your professor for grading in sections throughout the course. Each section will be reviewed and graded separately; this provides you with continuous formative feedback on the paper throughout the course.
Basic guidelines are as follows:
- The scholarly paper is to have a title page that follows the current APA manual
- Size and font style: Font size should be 10-12
- All work should have appropriate citations and reference
- Citations and references are to follow the APA manual
- References should be no more than 5 years old unless they are considered landmark Those from more than 5 years ago may reflect information and practice that is outdated and generally is not used.
- Sources:
- Wikipedia (or similar sites) is not to be used as a reference.
- Taber’s and/or other medical dictionaries or encyclopedias are not to be used as
- Follow guidelines on Scholarly Sources Handout posted in week 2
Topic Choice, Summary Statement & Journal Name for Submission of Manuscript to be submitted by Saturday 11:59 pm MT of Week #2
The first section of your scholarly paper is due in Week #2. In this assignment, you will identify your topic and provide a summary of the scholarly work. Many students start their work with a topic that is much too broad. The research question that you will post in Discussion Forum #1 this week is a part of this assignment. The research question will help to narrow your topic and must focus on an issue related to nursing education.
For guidance, please refer to this week’s reading assignment, Chapter 11 in Oermann & Hays: Writing for Publication in Nursing. This chapter discusses the “Writing Process” in depth. When thinking of a focus for the scholarly paper it is important to ask yourself the following questions: What difference will it make as a contribution to the profession of nursing? How will it be a meaningful product that can be utilized by others?”
The final part of this week’s assignment is the selection of the peer-reviewed journal that would be your choice for publication of your scholarly paper. Due to the short nature of the course, you are not required to submit your paper for publication. You will be required to follow that journal’s author guidelines for your virtual poster presentation in week 10.
Background/ Introduction to be submitted by Saturday 11:59 pm MT of Week #3
The background/ introduction provides the reader with a clear sense of why the topic for the scholarly paper was chosen, and includes the following elements:
- Background knowledge-brief summary of current knowledge of problem being addressed, and characteristics of the organization(s) in which it occurs.
- Local problem-nature and severity of the
- Intended improvement – describes the changes and improvements in care processes and patient outcomes of the proposed interventions
- Study questions-clearly states precisely the primary improvement-related question that the study intervention is designed to answer.
Literature Review to be submitted by Saturday 11:59 pm MT of Week #4
The literature review includes identifying current nursing, medical, and other pertinent journals and textbooks related to your chosen topic. Conducting a literature review includes a search of databases in order to identify information relevant to your topic. Literature searches should be limited to peer- reviewed professional nursing and medical journals, texts, and writings. NOTE: Include in your scholarly paper the databases where you obtained your required 10 articles (ex. CINAHL, PsychInfo, PubMed etc.).
After identifying the articles to be used in your literature review, conduct a critical analysis of each article and summarize the findings. The literature you choose should support your proposed intervention. While there is no page number requirement for the literature search it is typical that this portion of the paper may be around five pages.
Articles over 5 years old will not be accepted, unless approved by instructor.
Proposed Intervention to be submitted by Saturday 11:59 pm MT of Week #5
In this section, it is important to explain to the reader what you plan to do. What are the decisions you made in designing your proposed intervention? Include any ethical considerations or issues you felt were relevant, the setting in which the intervention will occur, the interventions that were selected and why, and how you plan to implement the intervention. (Please see Chapters 9&10 in Oermann & Hays.)
Proposed Metrics and Outcomes to be submitted by Saturday 11:59 pm MT of Week #6
In this section you will outline the metrics you would use to measure the success of your proposed intervention. Include the source of your metrics (should be from the evidence-based practice literature) and the hypothesized outcomes you anticipate from the intervention. Include risks and both potential positive and negative outcomes.
Discussion/ Implications/ Conclusions to be submitted by Saturday 11:59pm MT of Week #7
The discussion section of the paper is a place to highlight the successes and the challenges that may be experienced through the process of implementing the proposed intervention and the results of the anticipated and unanticipated outcomes. The paper should end with clear and data-driven conclusions and implications. You should highlight the lessons learned, including next steps for future investigations and challenges to the proposed intervention. Include implications of policy, education, practice, research and/or management as applicable.
Abstract to be submitted by Saturday 11:59 pm MT of Week #8
The abstract is a brief comprehensive summary of the entire body of the scholarly paper and should be approximately 250 words in length. It summarizes all key information about what is contained in the paper, including the purpose of the project, methods, design, results, and conclusions drawn by the author. The abstract is placed at the beginning of the paper, however, it is usually written after the body of the paper is completed. Follow the guidelines for the abstract as required by your chosen journal. Consult your 6th edition APA manual for abstract protocols and examples.
Final submission of a paper to be submitted by Saturday 11:59 pm MT of week #9
The final submission of your scholarly paper MUST be submitted in its entirety.
All work must be submitted electronically through Blackboard via SafeAssign.
Scholarly Paper Grading Rubric
| Descriptors | Points | Comments |
| Topic Choice & Summary Statement
o Clearly stated. o Clearly defined. o Sufficiently narrowed down to be answered by the selected methodology used for the intended intervention to the problem. (Peer-reviewed journal selection – included in the Week 2 assignment submission) |
10 | -2 points if not written in 3rd person
-2 points if APA is incorrect
-2 points if not proofread prior to submission |
NUR695: Scholarly Paper Assignment:
| Abstract
o Comprehensive summary of the entire body of the scholarly paper. |
10 | -2 points if not written in 3rd person
-2 points if APA is incorrect
-2 points if not proofread prior to submission |
| Introduction
o Clear sense of why the topic for the scholarly paper was chosen, and includes the following elements: 1. Background knowledge-brief summary of current knowledge of problem being addressed, and characteristics of the organization(s) in which it occurs. 2. Local problem-nature and severity of the problem. 3. Study questions-clearly states precisely the primary improvement-related question that the study intervention is designed to answer. |
15 | -2 points if not written in 3rd person
-2 points if APA is incorrect
-2 points if not proofread prior to submission |
| Literature Review
o Literature searches for nursing topics on the web and in databases are limited to peer-reviewed professional nursing and medical journals, texts, and writings (no older than 5 years). o Provides an overview of relevant studies including work from current nursing, medical, and other pertinent journals and textbooks related to the chosen topic. o The articles evaluated are appropriate to answer the stated problem, purpose, objectives or goals of the problem. |
15 | -2 points if not written in 3rd person
-2 points if APA is incorrect
-2 points if not proofread prior to submission |
| Proposed Intervention
o Clearly states the decisions made in designing the improvement project. Get Blue Haven Initiative Help o Defines any ethical considerations or issues relevant to QI studies and proposed intervention. o Clearly identifies the setting in which the work will be conducted.Do not include the name of the institution or location (ex. Suburban hospital in Midwest large city) o Summary of the interventions chosen and why they were chosen. o Identifies the plan to implement quality improvement appropriate to the problem statement. o Target population is identified. |
10 | -2 points if not written in 3rd person
-2 points if APA is incorrect
-2 points if not proofread prior to submission |
| Metrics and Outcomes
· Metrics used to measure the success of the proposed intervention include the source of the metrics (from the evidence-based practice literature) and why they were chosen/their fit with the proposed intervention. · Intended improvement – describes the changes and improvements in care processes and patient outcomes of the proposed interventions |
10 | -2 points if not written in 3rd person
-2 points if APA is incorrect
-2 points if not proofread prior to submission |
| Discussion/implications/conclusions
o Clearly discusses data-driven conclusions and implications that have broad applicability. o Highlights the lessons learned. o Identifies challenges and potential methods/approaches. o Describes the implications of the proposed intervention, including the implications of policy, education, practice, research and healthcare administration as applicable. o Recommendations for future research. |
15 |
-2 points if APA is incorrect
-2 points if not proofread prior to submission |
| Final submission of paper
Overall Quality/Writing Skills/Format o Guidelines for assignment were followed. o Appropriate variety of sources used. o Reference & internet links are current & accessible. o Correctly cited using APA format. o Presentation conforms to the author guidelines of the chosen journal. o Entire project is consistent with graduate level scholarly work. |
15 | -2 points if not written in 3rd person
-2 points if APA is incorrect
-2 points if not proofread prior to submission |
| Total: 100 |
