(Solved) NURS-FPX6212 Assessment 3: Outcome Measures, Issues, and Opportunities | Homework Solution
NURS-FPX6212 Assessment 3: Outcome Measures, Issues, and Opportunities
Draft a 6-page report on outcome measures, issues, and opportunities for the executive leadership team or applicable stakeholder group.
Preparation
Your executive summary captured the attention and interest of the executive leadership team, who have asked you to provide them with a detailed report addressing outcome measures and performance issues or opportunities, including a strategy for ensuring that all aspects of patient care are measured.
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
(Solved) NURS-FPX6212 Assessment 3: Outcome Measures, Issues, and Opportunities | Homework Solution
Just from $13/Page
Drafting the Report
- Analyze organizational functions, processes, and behaviors in high-performing health care organizations or practice settings.
- Determine how organizational functions, processes, and behaviors affect outcome measures associated with the systemic problem identified in your gap analysis.
- Identify the quality and safety outcomes and associated measures relevant to the performance gap you intend to close. Create a spreadsheet showing the outcome measures.
- Identify performance issues or opportunities associated with particular organizational functions, processes, and behaviors and the quality and safety outcomes they affect.
- Outline a strategy, using a selected change model, for ensuring that all aspects of patient care are measured and that knowledge is shared with the staff.
Outcomes Measures and Process Improvement
The following resources provide context and background information that will help you with this assessment.
- Fessele, K, Yendro, S., & Mallory, G. (2014). Setting the bar: Developing quality measures and education programs to define evidence-based, patient-centered, high-quality care. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 18, 7–11.
- In this article, the authors discuss how one group developed and then tested relevant quality measures.
- Goll, C. & Cahill, S. (2014). Leading the way: Enculturating the value of process improvement. American Nurse Today, 9(8), 1–4.
- In this article, the authors contend that the importance of a culture of accountability and ownership is crucial to attaining organizational outcomes.
- Huffstutler, C.D. & Thomsen, D. (2015). A framework for performance excellence and success. Frontiers of Health Science Management, 32(1), 45–50.
- In this article, the authors present a framework that describes the behaviors and beliefs of high-performing organizations.
- Masica, A. L., Richter, K. M., Convery, P., & Haydar, Z. (2009). Linking Joint Commission inpatient core measures and National Patient Safety Goals with evidence. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 22(2), 103–111.
- In this article, the authors summarize the relationships between Joint Commission core measures, safety goals, and patient outcomes.
- The Joint Commission (n.d.). National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI). Retrieved from https://nursingandndnqi.weebly.com/index.html
- Explore this resource and examine the indicators related to the effects of nursing on safety, quality, and outcomes.
- Vila Health: Quality and Safety Gap Analysis | Transcript.
- The following interactive exercise suggests an approach to drafting a detailed report for executive leaders addressing outcome measures and performance issues or opportunities, which may help you with the assessment.
Change Theory
- Mitchell, G. (2013). Selecting the best theory to implement planned change. Nursing Management, 20(1), 32–37.
- This article may help you in outlining a strategy for change. Get Ecoviron Protect Centre Homework Help
Risk Management
- Risk Management and Patient Safety Drag and Drop | Transcript.
- In this interactive exercise, you will examine the fundamental differences between risk management and patient safety.
Outcome Measures, Issues, and Opportunities Scoring Guide
| CRITERIA | NON-PERFORMANCE | BASIC | PROFICIENT | DISTINGUISHED |
| Analyze organizational functions, processes, and behaviors in high-performing organizations. | Does not analyze organizational functions, processes, and behaviors in high-performing organizations. | Lists organizational functions, processes, and behaviors in high-performing organizations, but does not analyze these practices or how they promote organizational success. | Analyzes organizational functions, processes, and behaviors in high-performing organizations. | Analyzes organizational functions, processes, and behaviors in high-performing organizations, and identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty (where further information could improve the analysis). |
| Determine how organizational functions, processes, and behaviors support and affect outcome measures for an organization. | Does not determine how organizational functions, processes, and behaviors support and affect outcome measures for an organization. | Attempts to describe positive and negative effects of organizational practices on specific outcome measures, but fails to explain the reasons for these effects. | Determines how organizational functions, processes, and behaviors support and affect outcome measures for an organization. | Determines how organizational functions, processes, and behaviors support and affect outcome measures for an organization, and identifies assumptions and reasons on which determination is based. |
| Identify typical quality and safety outcomes and their associated measures. | Does not identify typical quality and safety outcomes and their associated measures. | Mentions typical quality and safety outcomes and their associated measures, but does not show how they are measured in a spreadsheet. | Identifies typical quality and safety outcomes and their associated measures. | Identifies typical quality and safety outcomes and their associated measures, and evaluates the quality of the data. |
| Identify performance issues or opportunities associated with particular organizational functions, processes, and behaviors and the quality and safety outcomes they affect. | Does not identify performance issues or opportunities associated with particular organizational functions, processes, and behaviors and the quality and safety outcomes they affect. | Describes specific issues or opportunities and their relationships to effects on associated outcomes, but does not explain why particular organizational functions, processes, and behaviors present these issues or opportunities. | Identifies performance issues or opportunities associated with particular organizational functions, processes, and behaviors and the quality and safety outcomes they affect. | Identifies performance issues or opportunities associated with particular organizational functions, processes, and behaviors and the quality and safety outcomes they affect, and identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty. |
| Outline a strategy for ensuring that all aspects of patient care are measured and that knowledge is shared with the staff. | Does not outline a strategy for ensuring that all aspects of patient care are measured and that knowledge is shared with the staff. | Attempts to outline a strategy for ensuring that all aspects of patient care are measured and that knowledge is shared with the staff, but fails to list the key steps needed to implement the strategy; does not use a change model; or does not explain how information, knowledge, or best practices will be shared. | Outlines a strategy, using a selected change model, for ensuring that all aspects of patient care are measured and that knowledge is shared with the staff. | Outlines a strategy, using a selected change model, for ensuring that all aspects of patient care are measured and that knowledge is shared with the staff, highlighting opportunities for interprofessional collaboration. |
| Write coherently and with purpose, for a specific audience, using correct grammar and mechanics. | Does not write coherently and with purpose, for a specific audience; does not use correct grammar and mechanics. | Writing is generally coherent, but the tone or style is inappropriate or ineffective for the intended audience, or errors in grammar and mechanics inhibit effective communication. | Writes coherently and with purpose, for a specific audience, using correct grammar and mechanics. | Writes coherently and with purpose. Grammar and mechanics are error-free. |
| Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. | Does not integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions; does not correctly format citations and references using APA style. | Sources lack relevance or credibility, are poorly integrated, or are incorrectly formatted. | Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. | Integrates relevant, credible, and convincing sources of evidence to support assertions. Sources are current, and citations and references are error-free. |
