(Solved) Week 5 Assignment – Program Evaluation | Homework Solution
Week 5 Assignment – Program Evaluation
For this assignment, write a 6–8 page paper on program evaluation based upon the Riverbend City scenario presented in this unit’s study. Distinguish the three different types of program evaluation and identify each of their functions, goals, and processes. Use the Riverbend City scenario to highlight specifically how these different program evaluations are being used and critique how multiple stakeholder perspectives are integrated to meet specific population needs, and how ethics are maintained in the process.
Be sure to address the following:
- Identify three types of program evaluation that were presented in the Riverbend City scenario.
- Describe the three types of program evaluation and their application in the scenario.
- Assess the program, utilizing the three types of program evaluations from the Riverbend City scenario.
- Examine ethical issues that arise in program evaluation, using at least two ethical standards from the National Organization of Human Services.
- Critique each program evaluation’s use of multiple stakeholders’ perspectives in determining their effectiveness for meeting the needs of special populations.
Your work should integrate the Riverbend City media presentation and references to your required readings. You are encouraged to support this paper with additional reputable sources. Use APA format.
| Week 5 Assignment – Program Evaluation | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| Assess program quality using standards-based evaluation.
view longer description |
36 to >30.6 pts
DISTINGUISHED Critiques the implementation of standards-based evaluation in assessing program quality, highlighting its effectiveness in meeting the needs of specific stakeholders and/or diverse populations. 30.6 to >25.2 pts PROFICIENT Assesses program quality using standards-based evaluation. 25.2 to >0 pts BASIC Describes standards-based evaluation conceptually or in application in a specified scenario, but does not assess it in relation to program quality. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not address program quality using standards-based evaluation. |
/ 36 pts |
| Assess program efficiency and effectiveness using process evaluation.
view longer description |
36 to >30.6 pts
DISTINGUISHED Critiques the implementation of process evaluation in assessing program efficiency and its effectiveness in meeting the needs of specific stakeholders and/or populations. 30.6 to >25.2 pts PROFICIENT Assesses program efficiency and effectiveness using process evaluation. 25.2 to >0 pts BASIC Describes process evaluation conceptually or in application in a specified scenario, but does not assess it in relation to program efficiency and effectiveness. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not address program efficiency and effectiveness using process evaluation. |
/ 36 pts |
| Assess program effectiveness using outcome evaluation.
view longer description |
36 to >30.6 pts
DISTINGUISHED Critiques the implementation of outcome evaluation in assessing program effectiveness in meeting the needs of specific stakeholders and/or diverse populations. 30.6 to >25.2 pts PROFICIENT Assesses program effectiveness using outcome evaluation. 25.2 to >0 pts BASIC Describes outcome evaluation conceptually or in application in a specified scenario, but does not assess it in relation to program effectiveness. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not describe program effectiveness using outcome evaluation. |
/ 36 pts |
| Examine what ethical issues arise in conducting program evaluation.
view longer description |
28 to >23.8 pts
DISTINGUISHED Critiques the application of several ethical standards when conducting program evaluation in a specified scenario. 23.8 to >19.6 pts PROFICIENT Examines what ethical issues arise in conducting program evaluation. 19.6 to >0 pts BASIC Highlights ethical issues, but does not specifically link them to the program evaluation presented in a specified scenario. Get GCU Code of Conduct Essay Help!! 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not identify what ethical issues arise in conducting program evaluation. |
/ 28 pts |
| Critique how each type of program evaluation utilizes multiple stakeholder perspectives.
view longer description |
28 to >23.8 pts
DISTINGUISHED Critiques how each type of program evaluation addresses diversity through multiple stakeholder perspectives, accessibility, and culturally sensitive approaches. 23.8 to >19.6 pts PROFICIENT Critiques how each type of program evaluation utilizes multiple stakeholder perspectives. 19.6 to >0 pts BASIC Discusses multiple stakeholder perspectives, relating some aspects regarding accessibility or culturally sensitive approaches used in program evaluation, but does not critique them. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not discuss how each type of program evaluation utilizes multiple stakeholder perspectives. |
/ 28 pts |
| Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession.
view longer description |
36 to >30.6 pts
DISTINGUISHED Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, is consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession, and is supported with reputable sources. 30.6 to >25.2 pts PROFICIENT Communicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession. 25.2 to >0 pts BASIC Communicates with persistent writing errors that impede the message or includes language the is not respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, consistent with expectations for members of the human services profession. |
|
