(Answered) PSY 560 Final Project Solution

PSY 560 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

Overview

The final project for this course is focused on one specific personality theory (or set of theories) for which you will demonstrate an in-depth knowledge of the subject matter, provide a nuanced, critical analysis of the subject matter, and illustrate the theory’s relevance in the field today. This will be accomplished by producing a theoretical analysis which will include a detailed description of the theories’ major concepts, the key theorists, and the published research regarding the theory.

You will provide a critical analysis of the validity of the theory, its strengths and weaknesses, and the cultural utility of the theory. Finally, you will consider the theory’s contemporary relevance and its place within the larger context of the field of personality psychology by proposing an application of the theory to a contemporary issue or phenomenon and discussing the possible future development of this theory.

The project will be developed over the length of the course as you will submit three outlines for feedback before completing the final draft. The outlines will be due in Modules Three, Five, and Seven. The final product will be submitted in Module Nine.

Refer to the Project Topics document (linked in the project review task in Module One) for a list of approved theories for this project.

In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:

• Evaluate the use of personality theories in published research for validity and contemporary relevance
• Analyze contemporary theories in personality psychology for their changing roles in the field over time
• Defend the use of personality psychology theories by assessing them against alternative theoretical perspectives
• Illustrate the applicability of theories in personality psychology to contemporary issues and different cultural perspectives
• Formulate conclusions on the contemporary use of theories in personality psychology based on theoretical analysis

Prompt

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

1. Background and Basics of the Theory
   1. Provide a historical overview of your selected theory, including relevant historical events that influenced the theory.
   2. Analyze the historical development of the theory based on when and where it was developed. Consider what the prevailing theories of the time were. How does this theory relate to the earlier theories?
   3. Identify the key theorist (theorists) associated with this theory. Provide the relevant biographical information and historical events that may have influenced the theorist’s work and led to the development of the theory.
   4. Articulate the key concepts of this theory as conceived by the key theorist(s). Support your response with relevant research. Be sure to include primary sources and noteworthy or historically relevant research.
   5. Discuss how the theory is used today, identifying key differences from its initial application. What key concepts in the theory have changed over time, and how has the theory’s role changed?
2. Evaluation and Comparison
   1. Develop a position statement regarding your theory’s continued relevance in personality psychology today. Your statement must be supported with logical rationale.
   2. Evaluate the validity and accuracy of your theory. Consider both primary and secondary resources and cite specific examples from the research to support your evaluation. Include both historical and current research in your evaluation and consider the differences where applicable
   3. Determine the theory’s appropriateness for a range of cultural perspectives in its contemporary use. Be sure to cite relevant research. How well does this theory make testable predictions about human behavior across a range of cultural perspectives, including those of special populations? Give specific examples from the research where possible.
   4. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the theory. Support your claims with research-based evidence.
   5. Based on the weaknesses you discover, choose two alternative personality theories to discuss. Be sure to explain how these alternative theories challenge the validity, weaknesses, or biases of your theory.
   6. Defend the usefulness of your theory in contemporary settings against the alternative theories and the challenges you just presented.

• Application and Conclusion
  1. Discuss the contemporary relevance of how your theory is used in the larger context of the field of personality psychology. Utilize current (within the last five years) research.
  2. Apply your theory in explaining a real-world problem or phenomenon.
     1. How would your key theorist(s) understand this problem in terms of its root cause and primary characteristics?
     2. Assess published contemporary research for solutions with the potential to address this problem or phenomenon. Does the contemporary use of your theory provide viable approaches to this problem? What are they?

• Explain how this application of your theory demonstrates the theory’s contemporary relevance and potential to advance knowledge within the field of personality psychology.

1. Summarize the changing use of your theory over time, including how its use compares with other theories in personality psychology.
2. Consider the future relevance of this theory within the field of personality psychology. How might it develop in order to remain relevant? Be specific about aspects of the theory that are most or least likely to contribute to the future relevance of the theory.

Milestones

Milestone One: Background and Basics of Theory

In Module Three, you will submit an outline of the Background and Basics of Theory section of the final project. This will include the historical overview of the theory, information about the key theorist(s) associated with the theory, and an introduction to the key concepts of the theory. Furthermore, the way the theory is used today will also be discussed. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone One Rubric.

Milestone Two: Evaluation and Comparison

In Module Five, you will create an outline of the Evaluation and Comparison section of the final project. This will begin with a position statement. Then evaluate the validity and accuracy of your theory based on both primary and secondary research, discuss the theory’s appropriateness for a range of cultural perspectives in its contemporary use, and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the theory. Based on the weaknesses you discover, choose two alternative personality theories to discuss and then defend the usefulness of your theory in contemporary settings against the alternative theories. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Two Rubric.

Milestone Three: Application and Conclusion

In Module Seven, you will submit an outline of the Application and Conclusion section of the final project. Utilize current research to support an explanation of the role this theory plays in the larger context of the field of psychology. Apply this theory to a real-world problem, including how the key theorists might understand the problem, how the theory could lend support for solutions to the problem, and how this relates to the role of your theory in the current field. Create a conclusion that considers the future of this theory in the field and how the theory might develop in order to remain relevant in the field. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Three Rubric.

Final Submission: Theoretical Analysis
In Module Nine, you will submit your final project. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Rubric.

What to Submit

Your theoretical analysis should be 10 to 15 pages in length with double spacing. Use APA style for formatting and citations. Your paper must utilize a minimum of ten scholarly resources, including primary resources from your selected theorist. Use the Final Project Template and submit it as a Microsoft Word document.

[Note: To complete this template, replace the bracketed text with your own content. Remove this note and all others in the template before you submit your assignment.]

Theoretical Analysis: [Theory Name]

[Your First and Last Name]

[Course Number and Name]

[Your Instructor’s Name]

[Date Assignment Is Due]

[Notes:

• Use APA format for all parts of the paper: margins, line spacing, paragraph spacing, headings, text justification, font type, size, color, and so forth. See the APA manual for specifics.
  Get Developing a Job Description Essay Help
• Do not include an abstract or an author’s note. The assignments do not ask for this.
• Do not include the questions or the assignment instructions in your papers.
• Use correct grammar, punctuation, and capitalization. Do a spell check. Use a formal APA tone in your writing.
• Do not include direct quotes. Explain everything in your own words only. Do not use lists. Do not ask questions. Your work should be written in complete sentences and full paragraphs.
• Do not use slang, anthropomorphism, or gendered language. Do not use personal pronouns. Do not refer to yourself in the paper. Do not say I, me, my, the writer, researcher, author, and so forth.]

Theoretical Analysis: [Theory Name]

[Carefully read both the assignment instructions and the grading rubric for this assignment so you will specifically know what to include in each of the required sections.]

Background and Basics of Theory: Historical Overview

[Insert text.]

Background and Basics of Theory: Historical Development

[Insert text.]

Background and Basics of Theory: Key Concepts

[Insert text.]

Background and Basics of Theory: Key Theorist(s)

[Insert text.]

Background and Basics of Theory: How the Theory Is Used Today

[Insert text.]

Evaluation: Position Statement

[Insert text.]

Evaluation: Validity and Accuracy

[Insert text.]

Evaluation: Cultural Perspectives

[Insert text.]

Evaluation and Comparison: Strengths and Weaknesses

[Insert text.]

Evaluation and Comparison: Alternative Personality Theories

[Insert text.]

Evaluation and Comparison: Defense

[Insert text.]

Application: Contemporary Relevance

[Insert text.]

Application: Real-World Problem or Phenomenon

[Insert text.]

Conclusion: Summary

[Insert text.]

Conclusion: Future Relevance of the Theory

[Insert text.]

References

[Notes:

References must be in alphabetical order. The list of references must be on a separate page.

Use the most recent edition of the APA manual to format the references.

Use only black 12-point Times New Roman font with double spacing, a hanging indent, and one-inch margins all around. Do not change the font color and do not underline.

In the retrieval information, do not include the database. Do not include the retrieval date. Include the DOI if the article has it.

If you include the electronic location, give only the shortest, most direct link to the actual article. Include only the direct URL to the article.

References must all be scholarly, professional, academic, and peer-reviewed journal articles. Other sources are not acceptable for academic research and referencing and are not to be used for this class, such as magazines, newspapers, encyclopedias, dictionaries, Wikipedia, other wikis, blogs, non-scholarly websites, or any non-scientific sources that do not provide quality researched materials (any source that does not use credible sources to support the information in the document).

For every reference in your list of references, your paper must also include the corresponding in-text citations. Make sure all citations correspond with the references and vice versa.

• All references must be cited.
• All citations must be referenced.

Format for Books: Last Name, F. I. (Year). Title of book. Publisher.
For example:
Carl, J. (2011). Think sociology. Prentice Hall.

Format for Scholarly Journal Articles: Last Name, F. I. (Year). Title of article. Title of Journal, volume number(issue number), page numbers. https://doi.org/10.xxxxxxx
For example:
Roehl, B. Q. (1999). The rhetoric of composition: Convincing others. Journal of Composition Studies, 36(2), 132–144. https://doi.org/10190299.jocs]