ENGL 1213 Fifth Syllabus Assignment: Response to Aurelius | Homework Solution

Fifth Syllabus Assignment: Response to Aurelius

Task:

Write a two-page essay in response to the meditations of Marcus Aurelius. The main problem you have to solve is finding an interesting angle on this ancient document. You can do this in several ways: You can argue for one of his ideas or against it; you can defend some idea of his against, for example, Epicurus; you can evaluate one of his ideas and offer a more complicated judgment than acceptance or rejection; Response to Aurelius

you can even apply some idea of his to a problem you encounter in our readings or in the world. You can even imitate Aurelius, as long as you use an essay structure and not a disjointed structure like the meditations. You have carte blanche to choose an approach.

If you are stuck . . .

Here are some possible prompts:

1. Re-read Who has a bettter philosophy? Why? Pick one of Epicurus’s points and weigh it against Aurelius’s ideas on the same topic. Is Stoicism or Epicureanism the more satisfactory philosophy?

2. Aurelius’s Stoicism was supposed to help him live These days we use therapists and advice columnists for this purpose. Read an advice column by Carolyn Hax, Dear Abby, Dear Prudence, or some other famous dispenser of counsel and evaluate the advice according to Aurelius’s Stoicism. Response to Aurelius What would Marcus think of the advice you found? Would he have a better or worse answer? How about Epicurus?

Get Qualitative Study Defense Assignment Help Now!!

3. Apply Aurelius’s thinking to something we have read this semester (or vise versa). The Stoic ideal of apatheia and Alana Massey’s concept of chill are pretty Are there important distinctions? Is there a good Stoic reading of Massey’s argument? Response to Aurelius How about King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail?”

4. Critique some part of our popular culture: Yoda, the Food Network, Marie Kondo, the Superbowl, our political discourse, the lyrics of a popular song . . . any of these things can be evaluated from a Stoic or an Epicurean point of

Specs:

Use two FULL pages and cite all sources in MLA style. Refer to Aurelius by book and section number, like this: (Meditations 2.1).

A few Pointers:

• Focus on proving your point, not explaining your
• Remember that you are proving your point in a conversation that is already going
• You have to show how your argument relates to what has already been
• Remember to support your claims with
• GIVE YOURSELF TIME TO

Major Course Topics

• Recursive writing processes (e.g., invention, drafting, peer review, instructor feedback, revision, editing, and proofreading)
• Analysis of the rhetorical situation (e.g., audience/purpose/text/context)
• Rhetorical strategies (e.g., logos, ethos, pathos)
• Structure, organization, and development of paragraphs and essays (e.g., topic sentences/thesis statements; introduction/body/conclusion; organizational patterns)
• Argumentative, analytic, and evaluative rhetorical structures (modes)
• Academic research (e.g., use of library databases; introduction to research tools such as Zotero)
• Evaluation of sources and source material (e.g., sources located using internet search engines and library databases)
• Summary, paraphrase, and quotation of source material
• Use of source material to support and develop ideas
• Incorporation of source material, Response to Aurelius (e.g., signal phrases, quotation marks, and parenthetical citations when appropriate; works cited page)
• Avoidance of plagiarism
• MLA conventions for formatting a paper and documenting the use of source material
• Introduction to APA conventions for formatting a paper and documenting the use of source material
• Editing for mechanical/grammatical correctness and style Response to Aurelius (e.g., sentence variety, word choice, tone)